I was stunned to read the epithet "Perennial Bad
Actor" applied to Dr. Terry Rondberg by publisher Don Petersen in a recent issue of Dynamic
Chiropractic.
Websters' defines "perennial bad actor" as a person whose behavior is
perpetually defective, unfit, unfavorable, rotten, incorrect, wicked, dangerous, offensive
and disgusting.
What exactly has Dr. Rondberg done to earn being called such names by Don Petersen?
Has Terry ever been charged with or convicted of any criminal activity? No. Has Terry
ever had action taken against his license by a state chiropractic board? No. Has he ever
done anything to hurt chiropractic? No. Does his family hate him? No.
Sadly, this attack is merely another in a long series of attempts to tear down a
competitor in chiropractic publishing and politics. Because Mr. Petersen cannot
effectively tear down Terry's message, he has resorted again to tearing down the
messenger.
Ever since Terry started The Chiropractic Journal, and began championing the
rights of subluxation-based chiropractors, Petersen has been out to destroy Terry's
credibility and cause people to disbelieve his message -- even when it is obviously
accurate.
Perhaps this latest attack came because Terry has recently been extremely effective at
generating support for the idea of putting subluxation correction first. In doing so, he's
upset a lot of people who want to make chiropractic more "medical." It's
probably not mere coincidence that the articles appeared just when the WCA was holding a
spectacular Summit in Washington, D.C., and meeting with key legislators.
In his editorial, Don Petersen even accused Terry of betraying conservative
chiropractic by announcing that the WCA could live with the word "diagnosis."
This is nonsense. It is clear that Terry stands for subluxation analysis/detection (or
diagnosis of vertebral subluxation!) and does not believe that chiropractors should be
required to perform full-body medical diagnosis (eyes, ears, nose, throat, heart, lungs,
abdomen, etc.).
After years of accusing him of being too straight, Peterson is now reduced to
trying to make the profession think he's too medical. When you think about it, the
allegation is almost comical.
The fact is, for the past 15 years, Dr. Terry Rondberg has been among the strongest and
most effective voices in defense of traditional subluxation-based chiropractic. If not for
him and others like him, chiropractic would very likely have been perverted into some
version of physical therapy or osteopathy.
There are those in the chiropractic profession who would like to move towards medicine
just as osteopathy did years ago. Terry is one of the key people who have stopped this
from happening.
The time has come for us to grow up and tone down the nasty rhetoric. Our profession
still has a long way to go. I read American Medical News every week and have never
found a letter to the editor that referred to anyone in such harsh terms as a
"perennial bad actor."
I have lobbied the Arizona Legislature for 14 years and have never heard a legislator
refer to a colleague in such condemnatory terms. The local newspapers reserved this
language for people like Charles Keating who cheated thousands of retirees out of millions
of dollars during the savings and loan collapse and fiasco. Terry Rondberg doesn't fit the
description.
If we are to take our rightful place in the health care arena, we need to win the
respect of those outside the profession. But the seeds of that respect need first to be
planted within our all borders. When each member of the chiropractic community treats
every other member with basic human respect, then those outside our community will begin
to treat us with respect as well.
(Dr. Alan Immerman is president of Independent Chiropractic Physicians in Arizona.
He can be contacted at amimmerman@earthlink.net.)