See also:
Two paths to Medicare Reform
ACA Medicare bill draws criticism from Washington Post, White House
The inclusion of the chiropractic demonstration project in
the Medicare prescription drug bill -- a provision written by and supported
by the American Chiropractic Association (ACA) -- has drawn fire from
politicians and the Capitol press.
In an article for The Washington Post, staff writer
Dan Morgan (July 14, 2003; Page A01) noted: "Tucked into the small print of
the 1,043‑page Senate version, for example, is a 'demonstration project'
allowing selected chiropractors to bill Medicare for many services not now
covered." He lumped the provision in with other tacked‑on amendments that
"would benefit marriage counselors, the weight‑management industry, rural
ambulance services, Hawaii's Medicaid program and doctors in Alaska."
According to the article, the ACA provision has also been
the target of criticism from the Oval Office. "The White House budget office
has criticized 'provisions that would increase the cost of the program and
that are unrelated to strengthening and improving Medicare.' It cited an
expansion of payments to teaching hospitals that train clinical
psychologists and the Senate bill's chiropractor demonstration project,"
Morgan stated.
The common perception is that the chiropractic provision
was one of a slew of amendments added on at the last minute ‑‑ amendments
which ultimately may help doom the bill to failure. The Washington Post
article reflected this assessment when it noted that there was a
"stampede by lawmakers to add unrelated provisions to the bill."
Morgan added that, "the legislation proved to be an
irresistible target for an army of health care lobbyists lured by the first
major Medicare bill to move through Congress in three years. Proposed
changes in the basic Medicare program now consume about 200 pages in the
Senate bill, one‑fifth of the total. Preliminary estimates suggest the
special provisions will add tens of billions of dollars to the legislation's
cost..."
A preliminary estimate of the Congressional Budget Office
put the cost of the bill, should it pass, at about $500 million during the
next two years. The escalating figure is particularly troublesome in light
of the July prediction by the Congressional Budget Office that the U.S.
deficit will soar to $455 billion.
"If the bill fails, many people will blame the
chiropractic provision and other amendments like it," said Terry A.
Rondberg, D.C., World Chiropractic Alliance President. "That's one reason
the WCA, along with the International Chiropractors Association and
Federation of Straight Chiropractors and Organizations, is working to
support HR 2560, the 'Chiropractic Medicare Freedom Bill.'
"We think it will have a much better chance of passing
since we can show that it will not mean additional costs to American
taxpayers," Dr. Rondberg explained. "It will add value to the Medicare
system, and position the chiropractic profession as health care heroes."
The bill will have to go through a negotiation process
called a House‑Senate conference, which could take as little as two months
but will probably last much longer according to most experts, possibly
stretching well into 2004. Health care lobbyists have already begun working
on legislators, trying to convince them to cut certain provisions and
support others.