Vaccine group says IOM played politics in report on autism and vaccines
The nation's largest and oldest parent-led vaccine safety
organization charged that a report on autism and vaccines issued by the
Institute of Medicine (IOM) seriously jeopardizes the credibility of IOM to
make an objective scientific analysis of vaccine risks.
Calling the report a case of "political immunology," the
National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) released a letter written by NVIC
President Barbara Loe Fisher to the National Academy of Sciences on December
18, 2000 expressing concern about the ideological and professional conflicts
of interest of members of the Committee.
"This report is a case of political immunology masquerading as real science.
With it, the Institute of Medicine takes a step toward weakening its
reputation as an independent body capable of making an objective scientific
analysis of complex medical risk issues which are influenced by government
policy and industry profits,'' said Fisher.
In her 2000 letter to IOM, Fisher pointed out that, unlike the 1991 and 1994
reports issued by the Institute under a congressional mandate from the
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, the current Immunization
Safety Review Committee was assembled at the request of and funded by the
federal Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), specifically the
Center's for Disease Control (CDC) and National Institutes of Health (NIH).
DHHS is responsible for the research, development, regulation, policymaking
and promotion of mass use of vaccines. At the time, she questioned whether
the Committee could remain objective when assessing vaccine risk issues
which affect entrenched public health policy due to the fact that (1) the
CDC and NIH were directing and funding the Committee's work; and (2)
Committee members had a public health policy background and were receiving
NIH research grants or were employed by universities receiving NIH, CDC and
vaccine industry research grants.
"For this Committee to reject emerging biological mechanism evidence of a
causal relationship between vaccines and brain damage leading to autism in
favor of flawed epidemiological studies primarily using old medical records
is tragic. For this Committee to basically give the green light to
government and industry to eliminate autism from cost benefit analyses of
thimerosal risks is beyond belief because it could pave the way for mercury
to remain in vaccines here and around the world. Failing to consider the
fact that DPT and MMR vaccine induced brain inflammation can lead to brain
damage in some children, including autism, is just one example of how
simplistic and superficial this analysis of the relationship between
vaccines and autism is. When the real science comes out demonstrating that
vaccines can cause autism in genetically susceptible children, this
Committee's conclusions will be meaningless,'' said Fisher.
NVIC has been calling for independent, non-governmental, non-industry
research into the genetic and other biological high risk factors of vaccine
associated brain and immune system dysfunction, including autism, for the
past two decades. The IOM report discouraged further research into
vaccine-associated autism. NVIC also supports removing vaccine risk research
and monitoring from the CDC and NIH because of conflicts of interest.