Medical doctors aren’t aware of radiation risks
Although the use of
radiation for medical examinations and tests is the largest manmade source
of radiation exposure, most medical doctors aren’t aware of the long-term
health risks associated with radiological imaging. “Few doctors know the
level of radiation that their patients are exposed to during
radiological investigations,” stated Eugenio Picano, senior medical
researcher at the Institute of
Clinical Physiology in Italy.
According to Picano’s
report, published in BMJ (formerly, the British Medical Journal),
up to a third of radiological examinations are totally or partially
inappropriate. To make matters worse, long-term risks are often ignored in
cost-effectiveness analysis of medical imaging.
“The use of procedures
with a high load of radiation continues to grow steadily,” Picano notes.
“The medical sources of radiation in industrialised countries may therefore
soon be greater than natural sources. Ivan Illich wrote in 1976 (at the
beginning of the imaging era): ‘Act so that the effect of your action is
compatible with the permanence of genuine human life. Very concretely
applied this could mean: Do not raise radiation levels unless you know that
this action will not be visited upon your grandchild.’ The contemporary
practice of imaging seems to ignore this sound advice.”
To avoid this misuse,
he believes that doctors should be required to have a radiological “driving
licence” with penalty points given for inappropriate prescriptions.
The researcher
suggested that patients be required to sign a very clearly written informed
consent form for each radiological examination. This would help reduce
pressure from patients for redundant examinations, they noted. Journals
should also encourage reporting of radiation doses in papers.
The current culture has
taught patients that the most expensive tests are likely to be the most
effective, says the author. In a culture of shared responsibility, any
useless risk – no matter how small – should be avoided.
SOURCE:
“Sustainability of medical imaging,” by Eugenio Picano. BMJ, March 6,
2004.